Ramana Maharshi : “I” and “You” – Sage Ribhu and His Disciple Nidagha
Maharshi’s Gospel
(A devotee started the discussion, and then the story of Sage Ribhu and Disciple Nidagha is told.)
Devotee: However much I may try, I do not seem to catch the ‘l’. It is not even clearly discernible.
Maharshi: Who is it that says that the ‘I’ is not discernible? Are there two ‘I’s in you that one is not discernible by the other?
D: Instead of enquiring ‘Who am I?’, can I put the question to myself ‘Who are You?’, since then, my mind may be fixed on You whom I consider to be God in the form of Guru. Perhaps, I would be nearer the goal of my quest by that enquiry than by asking myself ‘Who am I?’
M: Whatever form your enquiry may take, you must finally come to the one I, the Self. All these distinctions made between the ‘I’ and ‘you’, Master and disciple etc. are merely a sign of one’s ignorance. The ‘I-Supreme’ alone is. To think otherwise is to delude oneself.
A Puranic story of Sage Ribhu and his disciple Nidagha, is particularly instructive in this context.
(Maharshi told the story as follows).
Although Ribhu taught his disciple the supreme Truth of the One Brahman without a second, Nidagha, in spite of his erudition and understanding, did not get sufficient conviction to adopt and follow the path of jnana, but settled down in his native town to lead a life devoted to the observance of ceremonial religion.
But the Sage loved his disciple as deeply as the latter venerated his Master. In spite of his age, Ribhu would himself go to his disciple in the town, just to see how far the latter had outgrown his ritualism. At times the Sage went in disguise, so that he might observe how Nidagha would act when he did not know that he was being observed by his Master.
On one such occasion, Ribhu, who had put on the disguise of a village rustic, found Nidagha intently watching a royal procession. Unrecognized by the town dweller Nidagha, the village rustic enquired what the bustle was all about, and was told that the king was going in procession.
“Oh! It is the king. He goes in procession! But where is he?” asked the rustic.
“There, on the elephant”, said Nidagha.
“You say the king is on the elephant. Yes, I see the two”, said the rustic, “But which is the king and which is the elephant?”
“What!” exclaimed Nidagha, “You see the two, but do not know that the man above is the king and the animal below is the elephant?Where is the use of talking to a man like you?”
“Pray, be not impatient with an ignorant man like me”, begged the rustic. “But you said ‘above’ and ‘below’, what do they mean?”
Nidagha could stand it no more. “You see the king and the elephant, the one above and the other below. Yet you want to know what is meant by ‘above’ and ‘below’?” burst out Nidagha. “If things seen and words spoken can convey so little to you, action alone can teach you. Bend forward, and you will know it all too well”.
The rustic did as he was told. Nidagha got on his shoulders and said “Know it now. I am above as the king, you are below as the elephant. Is that clear enough?”
“No, not yet”, was the rustic’s quiet reply. “You say you are above like the king, and I am below like the elephant. The ‘king’, the ‘elephant’, ‘above’ and ‘below’, so far it is clear. But pray, tell me what you mean by ‘I’ and ‘you’?”
When Nidagha was thus confronted all of a sudden with the mighty problem of defining the ‘you’ apart from the ‘I’, light dawned on his mind.
At once he jumped down and fell at his Master’s feet saying, “Who else but my venerable Master, Ribhu, could have thus drawn my mind from the superficialities of physical existence to the true Being of the Self? Oh, benign Master, I crave thy blessings”.
(Ramana Maharshi told the story and then continued to speak to the devotee).
M: Therefore, while your aim is to transcend here and now these superficialities of physical existence through atma vichara, where is the scope for making the distinctions of ‘you’ and ‘I’, which pertain only to the body? When you turn the mind within, seeking the source of thought, where is the ‘you’ and where is the ‘I’?
You should seek and be the Self that includes all.
D: But is it not funny that the ‘I’ should be searching for the ‘I’? Does not the enquiry, ‘Who am I?’ turn out in the end an empty formula? Or, am I to put the question to myself endlessly, repeating it like some mantra?
M: Self-enquiry is certainly not an empty formula; it is more than the repetition of any mantra. If the enquiry, ‘Who am I?’ were a mere mental questioning, it would not be of much value. The very purpose of Self-enquiry is to focus the entire mind at its source. It is not, therefore, a case of one ‘I’ searching for another ‘I’.
Much less is Self-enquiry an empty formula, for it involves an intense activity of the entire mind to keep it steadily poised in pure Self-awareness.
Self-enquiry is the one infallible means, the only direct one, to realise the unconditioned, Absolute Being that you really are.